The College Football Playoff doesn't care about the Fornelli 50. This isn't breaking news to you. I often wonder if the committee should care about a formula like the one I use, and hope that whatever metrics they use to choose the four best teams in the country, they're at least of the same principles that my formula uses.

Not because I think the way I do things is better -- OK maybe a little -- but because, when evaluating 65 teams, math can be quite beneficial. It removes any possible biases from the mind of the ones looking at the data about which team is good, and which team isn't as bad as it possibly looked that one Saturday when it was losing to Iowa by 31.

Which brings me to Ohio State and its playoff case. There has been talk about Ohio State's potential to reach the playoff should it win out and win the Big Ten title. That would give the Buckeyes wins over Michigan and Wisconsin, which would theoretically improve their resume enough to possibly earn a spot in the top four despite two losses by an average of 23 points.

So I did a small experiment with the Buckeyes. I removed their losses from the equation to see how they'd stack up without them. Now, when I say I took out the losses, I mean that quite literally. Wins and losses carry more weight in my formula than anything else, but they're only part of the final picture. What I didn't remove was the way Ohio State played in those two losses. That all still counts, because that's performance.

The results surprised me a bit. With the losses on their resume, the Buckeyes have a score of 10.450 (the highest possible score that nobody will ever come close to reaching is 20). When I removed their losses, Ohio State's score climbed to 11.182. It's a significant boost to the score, as it improved by seven percent, but what matters is what that improvement would mean in the overall rankings.

And, honestly, it wouldn't mean very much.

With an 11.182 the Buckeyes would move up, but only to No. 5. They'd still be behind Alabama, Miami, Oklahoma, and yes, Wisconsin in these rankings.

All of which makes me wonder if this team truly would deserve a spot in the final four if it wins the Big Ten. In my mind, Ohio State would not only have to win its final two games, but do so in impressive fashion.

As for the rest of my rankings that the committee doesn't care about, here's a quick reminder of how it all works. You can find a more detailed explanation here.

  • My opinion has absolutely nothing to do with the rankings, they're math-based
  • There is true equality to start as math doesn't play favorites
  • Wins and losses mean more than anything
  • The formula is in no way predictive, it's a meritocracy
  • I won't share the formula, but it works
  • Tuesday night's MAC results are not included in these rankings

No Longer Ranked: UAB (41), Georgia Tech (45), Wyoming (48), Navy (49)